Guide · Industrial artificial intelligence
Autonomous AI agents what they are and how they work in a plant
How it looks today
The alarm says what happened, not why or what to do
The answers exist, but in four places: the July work order in the maintenance system, the vibration on a sensor, the procedure in a folder and the stock in the storeroom. Pulling them together depends on who is on shift and how much they remember.
What it is
What an autonomous AI agent is made of
A goal, a model that reasons, tools, memory and limits. Any platform brings the first four; the plant decides the fifth.
Goal
In the iGromi engine
Model
In the iGromi engine
Tools
In the iGromi engine
Memory
In the iGromi engine
Limits
In the iGromi engine
| Part | In the iGromi engine |
|---|---|
| Goal | "Explain why line 2 stopped and what to do." |
| Model | The Swappable Cognitive Core: local on the Edge or via API. |
| Tools | Read PLC and sensor signals, find work orders, create a draft. |
| Memory | The Second Brain: only approved, current knowledge, with its source. |
| Limits | What it looks up, what it proposes and what it may execute with authorization. |
Differences
Autonomous agent, chatbot and classic automation
The PLC and SCADA keep doing what they do well: control and supervise with fixed logic. The agent does not replace them; it works on top, reading their data read-only.
How it starts
Chatbot
PLC / SCADA
Autonomous agent
What it does
Chatbot
PLC / SCADA
Autonomous agent
Where it runs
Chatbot
PLC / SCADA
Autonomous agent
What it knows about the plant
Chatbot
PLC / SCADA
Autonomous agent
When it is wrong
Chatbot
PLC / SCADA
Autonomous agent
What it requires
Chatbot
PLC / SCADA
Autonomous agent
| Chatbot | PLC / SCADA | Autonomous agent | |
|---|---|---|---|
| How it starts | With a question | With a fixed rule | With a goal |
| What it does | Answers and waits | Runs the same logic every time | Chains steps: looks up, cross-checks, proposes |
| Where it runs | In a chat | In the PLC, in the machine scan cycle | In the engine, outside the control network |
| What it knows about the plant | What you type | The signals wired to it | Signals, work orders, procedures and history |
| When it is wrong | A bad answer | Fails the same way every time, and it shows | A chain of steps built on a bad premise |
| What it requires | Checking the answer | Testing and validating the program | Written limits, sources and a log of every step |
On the plant floor
How an agent works in a plant, step by step
The line 2 conveyor stops at 10:02. This is how the agent and the people resolve it in 30 minutes, with the July failure on record.
The Orchestrator
Look up, propose and execute: the three levels
In the iGromi engine, the Orchestrator coordinates Agents with their tools and permissions. Every action falls into one of three levels, and the third exists only if someone authorized it beforehand.
Level 1
Look up
Gets information without changing the operation.
"How many times has the M-204 failed since July?"
Level 2
Propose
Recommends an action without carrying it out.
Drafts the work order for someone to approve.
Level 3
Execute
Carries out an action that was authorized and audited beforehand.
Creates the order Carla asked for, under her name.
Never
Write to the PLC or change setpoints on its own. Machine control stays with the PLC and with authorized people.
Risks and controls
What can go wrong with an autonomous agent and how it is controlled
Every decision leaves its trail: what the agent proposed, from which sources, who decided and what happened next.
It answers with what it believes, not what is on record
Control
It chains steps on a wrong premise
Control
It touches the machine
Control
It sees more than it should
Control
Nobody answers for what it did
Control
It depends on one AI vendor
Control
| Risk | Control |
|---|---|
| It answers with what it believes, not what is on record | It only uses approved, current knowledge and cites the source of every figure. |
| It chains steps on a wrong premise | It stops at "propose": a person reviews before anything changes. |
| It touches the machine | It reads the PLC read-only. It does not write setpoints or change the program. |
| It sees more than it should | Permissions by access level: the agent sees what its user is allowed to see. |
| Nobody answers for what it did | Every proposal and every approval is logged with who, when and what evidence. |
| It depends on one AI vendor | The model is swappable: local on the Edge or via API. Memory and permissions stay the same. |
Your data
Where the agent works and where the data stays
iGromi cloud, separated per company
The shift app: chat, photo and voice records, and AI that answers with its source.
A private, isolated cloud for your company
Adds SAP, ERP and spreadsheets. The AI model runs inside that cloud.
Inside your plant, on Edge or on-premise
Adds PLCs, sensors and cameras. The Edge reads the PLC read-only and keeps measuring offline.
FAQ
Autonomous AI agents FAQ
What are autonomous AI agents?
How is an autonomous agent different from a chatbot?
Does an AI agent replace the PLC or SCADA?
What is the Orchestrator?
What is an AI harness?
What are the risks of an autonomous agent in a plant?
What does a plant need to use AI agents?
Keep reading
Agents, industrial AI and the engine
Every shift without a record is data you lose. Start free.
- 1Request early access, free
- 2Pick your trade: maintenance, production or safety
- 3Your team starts with the chat and its trade helper
No credit card. Your data stays yours.