Back to the blog

ComparisonsJan 1, 2026

iGromi vs Monitor EAM: Two Chilean CMMS Platforms Compared (2026)

Both were born in Chile and both speak native Spanish. But they differ sharply on cost, IoT focus and implementation speed. An unfiltered comparison...

iGromi vs Monitor EAM: Two Chilean CMMS Platforms Compared (2026)

A Home-Turf Fight: Chile vs Chile #

Monitor EAM is the "grandfather" of CMMS in Chile. It has been on the market for 20+ years, has heavyweight customers (mining, pulp and paper) and knows the quirks of Chilean plants better than anyone.

iGromi is the "rebel grandchild". Founded in 2022, 100% focused on IoT + Edge Computing, with the mission of making CMMS accessible to small and mid-sized plants, not just corporations.

This comparison is personal. I know people on both teams. But the data doesn't lie.

🎯 TL;DR (The Truth in 30 Seconds)

  • Monitor EAM: If you are in mining or forestry, or you have 1,000+ critical assets and an enterprise budget.
  • iGromi: If you are in manufacturing, food or metalworking, with 50-500 assets, and you need IoT NOW.

Comparison Table: What Matters #

Feature iGromi Monitor EAM
Base cost (100 assets) Quoted per plant Enterprise-tier annual license
Years on the market Since 2022 22+ years (2002)
Main focus Predictive IoT + Edge Full EAM management
Typical customers Manufacturing SMBs Mining, Pulp & Paper, Utilities
Native IoT ✅ Core of the system ⚠️ Optional module
On-premise ✅ Docker included ✅ Local installation
Purchasing module ❌ Basic (stock) ✅ Full procurement
Contract management ❌ No ✅ Advanced outsourcing
Offline mobile app ✅ Fully offline PWA ✅ Android/iOS app
Technical support Direct WhatsApp Formal help desk

1. Cost: The Elephant in the Room #

Monitor EAM is enterprise-grade, and its pricing shows it:

  • Base license: billed annually (varies with the number of users and modules)
  • Implementation: a separate project (depends on plant size)
  • Training: billed separately (on-site workshops)
  • Extra modules: Procurement, Contracts and Advanced BI, each billed on its own

Year 1 total (mid-sized plant): license, implementation, training and modules added together.

iGromi is quoted per plant:

  • Monthly base platform + modules (no per-tag fees)
  • Users and cameras: per seat and per camera
  • Support and maintenance: quoted separately

iGromi's cost depends on how many lines, cameras and users you connect; it is quoted per plant. Compare it against the Monitor total with your quote in hand.

"Monitor EAM is a big investment in year one. Is it worth the price? If you are a large mining company or a forestry operation with hundreds of assets, absolutely. If you are a 50-person food plant... probably not."

2. Maturity vs Speed #

Monitor EAM: The Titanic (in a good way)

Monitor has spent 22 years refining its product:

  • They have seen EVERYTHING: from mining fleet maintenance to running hydroelectric plants.
  • Its Procurement module integrates with SAP, Softland and custom Chilean ERPs.
  • Outsourced-contract management (essential in mining).
  • Full audit trail: every click is logged (ideal for ISO 55000).

The catch: that much maturity means complexity. You need 2-3 months of implementation and an internal "super user".

iGromi: The Speedboat

iGromi is 6 years old and its philosophy is the opposite:

  • "Glorious Minimum Viable Product": only the features 80% of plants actually use.
  • Implementation through a focused pilot (not 3 months).
  • IoT from day 1: connect Modbus sensors and you're done.

The limit: if you need complex contract management or multi-warehouse, multi-company setups, iGromi falls short.

3. IoT: The Huge Difference #

This is where iGromi crushes Monitor.

Monitor EAM:

  • It has an IoT module... but it is an add-on built later (not core).
  • Limited connectivity: you need external middleware for Modbus/OPC-UA sensors.
  • Extra cost: the IoT module is billed separately every year.

iGromi:

  • Born as an Edge IIoT platform with a built-in CMMS (not the other way around).
  • An Edge PC on site (quoted).
  • Native protocols: Modbus TCP/RTU, OPC-UA, MQTT, 4-20mA.
  • Machine learning at the edge: detects vibration/temperature anomalies and creates work orders automatically.

Example: a textile plant with 300 looms needed to monitor motor current to detect yarn jams.

  • With Monitor: a quote for the license + IoT module + partner sensors. Implementation: 8 weeks.
  • With iGromi: quoted per plant (platform + sensors + Edge PC). Implementation: within a focused pilot.

This is an illustrative cost comparison, not a customer.

4. When Does Monitor EAM Win? #

Monitor EAM is unbeatable if you need:

Complex Outsourcing Management

In mining, 60% of maintenance is done by contractors. Monitor lets you:

  • Create framework contracts with KPIs (MTBF, MTTR).
  • Measure performance by contractor.
  • Trigger automatic payments when SLAs are met.

iGromi doesn't do this. Period.

Enterprise Multi-Site

If you have 10 plants spread across Chile, Peru and Colombia and need centralized consolidation with ultra-granular roles, Monitor scales without breaking a sweat.

Legacy ERP Integration

Monitor connects natively with:

  • SAP PM/MM (bidirectional sync)
  • Softland (a Chilean ERP)
  • Custom systems via SOAP/REST

iGromi has a REST API, but IF you need to sync 20 tables with SAP in real time... you're going to suffer.

5. When iGromi Sweeps the Board #

SMBs on a Tight Budget

If an annual enterprise license burns through your budget, iGromi gives you the essentials of Monitor with a per-plant quote.

Plants That Need IoT NOW

If your #1 priority is predictive (vibration, temperature, current), iGromi starts with IoT from the pilot.

Fast Implementations

If your boss asked for a working CMMS as soon as possible (because the spreadsheet collapsed), iGromi starts with a focused pilot. Monitor needs 3+ months.

6. Cost Compared: A 200-Asset Plant #

Monitor EAM scenario:

  • License (5 users): billed annually
  • Implementation: one-time payment
  • Training: billed separately
  • IoT module: billed annually
  • 3-year total: implementation plus three years of license and IoT module

iGromi scenario:

  • Base platform + modules: quoted per plant (no per-tag fees)
  • Hardware: an Edge PC on site (quoted)
  • Support and maintenance: quoted separately

iGromi's cost depends on how many lines, cameras and users you connect; it is quoted per plant. Compare it against Monitor's 3-year total with your quote in hand.

7. The "Made in Chile" Factor #

Both are Chilean, but with nuances:

Monitor EAM:

  • Offices in Santiago, Concepción and Antofagasta.
  • A team of 30+ people (support, development, sales).
  • They know Chilean regulators better than anyone: the Dirección del Trabajo (Chile's labor inspectorate) and Sernageomin (Chile's national mining and geology service).

iGromi:

  • A lean startup: 4 people (me + 3 engineers).
  • Support: soporte@igromi.com.
  • Upside: you talk to the person who designed the code, not a call center.
  • Downside: if I go on vacation for 2 weeks... support slows down.

8. Future Roadmap #

Monitor is betting on:

  • LATAM expansion (they already have customers in Peru and Colombia).
  • Advanced BI with embedded Power BI.
  • A Sustainability module (carbon footprint, ISO 14001).

iGromi is betting on:

  • Edge AI: running TensorFlow Lite models on the gateway.
  • A 100% offline mode for areas without internet (underground mining, forestry).
  • Digital twins of critical assets.

Final Verdict: It's Not One or the Other, It's Context #

🎯 The Unfiltered Truth

Monitor EAM is the Mercedes E-Class: reliable, powerful, with 20 years of maturity. If you have the budget and need enterprise features (contracts, multi-site, SAP integration), it's your option.

iGromi is the Mazda CX-5: more affordable, modern technology (IoT/Edge), a great fit for mid-sized plants that prioritize speed and fast ROI.

I've seen plants invest heavily in Monitor and use it as a glorified spreadsheet (because nobody trained them properly). I've also seen SMBs transform with iGromi, starting from a focused pilot.

The best CMMS isn't the most complete one. It's the one your team actually uses every day.

"If your technicians have to call support every time they create a work order... the software is too complex for your reality."

Still unsure?
Book 30 minutes with me. I'll help you choose (even if it's Monitor).

Topics

  • monitor eam alternative
  • cmms chile
  • chilean maintenance software
  • igromi vs monitor
  • eam software comparison
Bárbara Ruz

About the author

Bárbara RuzCTO

iGromi's CTO. Leads the architecture of iGromi OS and the platform's technical direction, turning messy industrial processes into elegant data flows.

@igromi · Free app

Secure industrial AI, on your plant’s phones.

  1. 1Request early access, free
  2. 2Pick your trade: maintenance, production or safety
  3. 3The AI reads, proposes and cites; a person decides
Request early access

No credit card. Your data stays yours.