ComparisonsJan 1, 2026
iGromi vs Monitor EAM: Two Chilean CMMS Platforms Compared (2026)
Both were born in Chile and both speak native Spanish. But they differ sharply on cost, IoT focus and implementation speed. An unfiltered comparison...

A Home-Turf Fight: Chile vs Chile #
Monitor EAM is the "grandfather" of CMMS in Chile. It has been on the market for 20+ years, has heavyweight customers (mining, pulp and paper) and knows the quirks of Chilean plants better than anyone.
iGromi is the "rebel grandchild". Founded in 2022, 100% focused on IoT + Edge Computing, with the mission of making CMMS accessible to small and mid-sized plants, not just corporations.
This comparison is personal. I know people on both teams. But the data doesn't lie.
🎯 TL;DR (The Truth in 30 Seconds)
- Monitor EAM: If you are in mining or forestry, or you have 1,000+ critical assets and an enterprise budget.
- iGromi: If you are in manufacturing, food or metalworking, with 50-500 assets, and you need IoT NOW.
Comparison Table: What Matters #
| Feature | iGromi | Monitor EAM |
|---|---|---|
| Base cost (100 assets) | Quoted per plant | Enterprise-tier annual license |
| Years on the market | Since 2022 | 22+ years (2002) |
| Main focus | Predictive IoT + Edge | Full EAM management |
| Typical customers | Manufacturing SMBs | Mining, Pulp & Paper, Utilities |
| Native IoT | ✅ Core of the system | ⚠️ Optional module |
| On-premise | ✅ Docker included | ✅ Local installation |
| Purchasing module | ❌ Basic (stock) | ✅ Full procurement |
| Contract management | ❌ No | ✅ Advanced outsourcing |
| Offline mobile app | ✅ Fully offline PWA | ✅ Android/iOS app |
| Technical support | Direct WhatsApp | Formal help desk |
1. Cost: The Elephant in the Room #
Monitor EAM is enterprise-grade, and its pricing shows it:
- Base license: billed annually (varies with the number of users and modules)
- Implementation: a separate project (depends on plant size)
- Training: billed separately (on-site workshops)
- Extra modules: Procurement, Contracts and Advanced BI, each billed on its own
Year 1 total (mid-sized plant): license, implementation, training and modules added together.
iGromi is quoted per plant:
- Monthly base platform + modules (no per-tag fees)
- Users and cameras: per seat and per camera
- Support and maintenance: quoted separately
iGromi's cost depends on how many lines, cameras and users you connect; it is quoted per plant. Compare it against the Monitor total with your quote in hand.
"Monitor EAM is a big investment in year one. Is it worth the price? If you are a large mining company or a forestry operation with hundreds of assets, absolutely. If you are a 50-person food plant... probably not."
2. Maturity vs Speed #
Monitor EAM: The Titanic (in a good way)
Monitor has spent 22 years refining its product:
- They have seen EVERYTHING: from mining fleet maintenance to running hydroelectric plants.
- Its Procurement module integrates with SAP, Softland and custom Chilean ERPs.
- Outsourced-contract management (essential in mining).
- Full audit trail: every click is logged (ideal for ISO 55000).
The catch: that much maturity means complexity. You need 2-3 months of implementation and an internal "super user".
iGromi: The Speedboat
iGromi is 6 years old and its philosophy is the opposite:
- "Glorious Minimum Viable Product": only the features 80% of plants actually use.
- Implementation through a focused pilot (not 3 months).
- IoT from day 1: connect Modbus sensors and you're done.
The limit: if you need complex contract management or multi-warehouse, multi-company setups, iGromi falls short.
3. IoT: The Huge Difference #
This is where iGromi crushes Monitor.
Monitor EAM:
- It has an IoT module... but it is an add-on built later (not core).
- Limited connectivity: you need external middleware for Modbus/OPC-UA sensors.
- Extra cost: the IoT module is billed separately every year.
iGromi:
- Born as an Edge IIoT platform with a built-in CMMS (not the other way around).
- An Edge PC on site (quoted).
- Native protocols: Modbus TCP/RTU, OPC-UA, MQTT, 4-20mA.
- Machine learning at the edge: detects vibration/temperature anomalies and creates work orders automatically.
Example: a textile plant with 300 looms needed to monitor motor current to detect yarn jams.
- With Monitor: a quote for the license + IoT module + partner sensors. Implementation: 8 weeks.
- With iGromi: quoted per plant (platform + sensors + Edge PC). Implementation: within a focused pilot.
This is an illustrative cost comparison, not a customer.
4. When Does Monitor EAM Win? #
Monitor EAM is unbeatable if you need:
Complex Outsourcing Management
In mining, 60% of maintenance is done by contractors. Monitor lets you:
- Create framework contracts with KPIs (MTBF, MTTR).
- Measure performance by contractor.
- Trigger automatic payments when SLAs are met.
iGromi doesn't do this. Period.
Enterprise Multi-Site
If you have 10 plants spread across Chile, Peru and Colombia and need centralized consolidation with ultra-granular roles, Monitor scales without breaking a sweat.
Legacy ERP Integration
Monitor connects natively with:
- SAP PM/MM (bidirectional sync)
- Softland (a Chilean ERP)
- Custom systems via SOAP/REST
iGromi has a REST API, but IF you need to sync 20 tables with SAP in real time... you're going to suffer.
5. When iGromi Sweeps the Board #
SMBs on a Tight Budget
If an annual enterprise license burns through your budget, iGromi gives you the essentials of Monitor with a per-plant quote.
Plants That Need IoT NOW
If your #1 priority is predictive (vibration, temperature, current), iGromi starts with IoT from the pilot.
Fast Implementations
If your boss asked for a working CMMS as soon as possible (because the spreadsheet collapsed), iGromi starts with a focused pilot. Monitor needs 3+ months.
6. Cost Compared: A 200-Asset Plant #
Monitor EAM scenario:
- License (5 users): billed annually
- Implementation: one-time payment
- Training: billed separately
- IoT module: billed annually
- 3-year total: implementation plus three years of license and IoT module
iGromi scenario:
- Base platform + modules: quoted per plant (no per-tag fees)
- Hardware: an Edge PC on site (quoted)
- Support and maintenance: quoted separately
iGromi's cost depends on how many lines, cameras and users you connect; it is quoted per plant. Compare it against Monitor's 3-year total with your quote in hand.
7. The "Made in Chile" Factor #
Both are Chilean, but with nuances:
Monitor EAM:
- Offices in Santiago, Concepción and Antofagasta.
- A team of 30+ people (support, development, sales).
- They know Chilean regulators better than anyone: the Dirección del Trabajo (Chile's labor inspectorate) and Sernageomin (Chile's national mining and geology service).
iGromi:
- A lean startup: 4 people (me + 3 engineers).
- Support: soporte@igromi.com.
- Upside: you talk to the person who designed the code, not a call center.
- Downside: if I go on vacation for 2 weeks... support slows down.
8. Future Roadmap #
Monitor is betting on:
- LATAM expansion (they already have customers in Peru and Colombia).
- Advanced BI with embedded Power BI.
- A Sustainability module (carbon footprint, ISO 14001).
iGromi is betting on:
- Edge AI: running TensorFlow Lite models on the gateway.
- A 100% offline mode for areas without internet (underground mining, forestry).
- Digital twins of critical assets.
Final Verdict: It's Not One or the Other, It's Context #
🎯 The Unfiltered Truth
Monitor EAM is the Mercedes E-Class: reliable, powerful, with 20 years of maturity. If you have the budget and need enterprise features (contracts, multi-site, SAP integration), it's your option.
iGromi is the Mazda CX-5: more affordable, modern technology (IoT/Edge), a great fit for mid-sized plants that prioritize speed and fast ROI.
I've seen plants invest heavily in Monitor and use it as a glorified spreadsheet (because nobody trained them properly). I've also seen SMBs transform with iGromi, starting from a focused pilot.
The best CMMS isn't the most complete one. It's the one your team actually uses every day.
"If your technicians have to call support every time they create a work order... the software is too complex for your reality."
Still unsure?
Book 30 minutes with me. I'll help you choose (even if it's Monitor).
Topics
- monitor eam alternative
- cmms chile
- chilean maintenance software
- igromi vs monitor
- eam software comparison

About the author
Bárbara RuzCTO
iGromi's CTO. Leads the architecture of iGromi OS and the platform's technical direction, turning messy industrial processes into elegant data flows.


